Monday, 18 August 2025

From Ife to Oyo: The Origins of Yoruba Kingship and the Primacy of Ile-Ife in Precolonial Yoruba History

Introduction

The history of the Yoruba people of present-day southwestern Nigeria is deeply tied to the concepts of origin, kingship, and legitimacy. While the Oyo Empire is often celebrated in historical accounts as one of the most powerful precolonial states in West Africa, its foundation cannot be understood outside of the Ife Empire, which predates Oyo both historically and mythologically. Ile-Ife is not only regarded as the spiritual nucleus of the Yoruba world but also the birthplace of dynastic kingship, from which virtually all Yoruba rulers trace their legitimacy. This essay examines the precedence of the Ife Empire before Oyo, highlighting the fact that no paramount ruler of Yorubaland originated from Oyo, but rather from Ile-Ife including Oranmiyan, the first Alaafin of Oyo.

Ile-Ife and the Origin of Kingship

According to Yoruba traditions, preserved in oral accounts and recorded by early historians such as Samuel Johnson (1921) in The History of the Yorubas, Ile-Ife is considered the cradle of humanity and the source of Yoruba civilization. The myth of Odùduwà places him as the progenitor of the Yoruba, whose descendants established kingdoms across the region. Ife therefore functioned as the original “empire” of the Yoruba, where spiritual and political authority was first institutionalized.

The centrality of Ile-Ife in Yoruba kingship is reinforced by the position of the Ooni of Ife, who is regarded not merely as a local ruler but as the custodian of Yoruba tradition and the spiritual father of all Yoruba monarchs. Toyin Falola and Matthew Heaton (2008), in A History of Nigeria, emphasize that “Ife provided the ideological and religious framework for kingship across Yorubaland, even when political power shifted to other centers.”

The Oyo Empire: A Political but Derivative Power

The rise of the Oyo Empire in the 15th and 16th centuries marked a new era in Yoruba political history. Oyo, with its highly organized cavalry, centralized administration, and extensive trade networks, became the dominant power in the region, extending its influence as far as Dahomey (present-day Benin) and the Niger Valley. However, despite its military and political dominance, Oyo could not claim independence from the Ife legacy.

The office of the Alaafin of Oyo, though powerful, was legitimized by descent from Odùduwà through Oranmiyan, one of Odùduwà’s sons (or grandson, depending on variant traditions). This underscores the derivative nature of Oyo’s kingship. Oranmiyan had earlier ruled in Benin, where he established the dynasty of the Obas, before returning to found Oyo. His authority as the first Alaafin thus rested on his Ife origin, not on any indigenous Oyo tradition.

Ife’s Enduring Primacy over Oyo

Even at the height of Oyo’s imperial expansion between the 17th and 18th centuries, the symbolic and spiritual supremacy of Ife was never eclipsed. While the Alaafin wielded immense temporal power, the Ooni of Ife retained ritual authority as the spiritual head of the Yoruba. This duality is reflective of what Ade Ajayi and Crowder (1971) describe as the “separation of spiritual primacy from political hegemony” in Yoruba history.

The claim that “no paramount ruler in Yoruba land came from Oyo” is thus historically valid. The rulers of Oyo, like those of Owo, Ila-Orangun, Ketu, Ijebu, Ekiti, Ondo and Benin, traced their legitimacy back to Ile-Ife. This enduring Ife connection explains why even in contemporary Yoruba consciousness, the Ooni of Ife is regarded as the custodian of Yoruba unity and heritage, regardless of Oyo’s historical dominance.

Conclusion

The precedence of Ile-Ife over Oyo reflects the distinction between cultural primacy and political power in Yoruba history. Ile-Ife represents the cradle of kingship and spiritual authority, while Oyo exemplifies the height of Yoruba political and military expansion. Oranmiyan, the founder of Oyo, derived his authority from Ile-Ife, underscoring the fact that Oyo’s greatness was an extension, rather than a replacement, of Ife’s legacy.

In sum, before the Oyo Empire, there was the Ife Empire; and while Oyo rose to military supremacy, the legitimacy of Yoruba kingship, past and present remains rooted in the sacred soil of Ile-Ife.


References

  • Johnson, Samuel (1921). The History of the Yorubas: From the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the British Protectorate.
  • Falola, Toyin & Heaton, Matthew (2008). A History of Nigeria. Cambridge University Press.
  • Ajayi, J. F. Ade & Crowder, Michael (1971). History of West Africa, Vol. 1. Longman.


Thursday, 14 August 2025

When Accountability Is Optional: The K1 Airport Incident and Nigeria’s Big Man Syndrome

By Steve Owaduge, Akure, Ondo State

The recent appointment of Fuji music legend Wasiu Ayinde Marshal, popularly known as K1 De Ultimate, as an ambassador for airport security protocol has stirred public debate and rightly so. Coming on the heels of a serious security breach at Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, this decision raises troubling questions about the integrity of our institutions and the rule of law in Nigeria.

On August 5, 2025, K1 was involved in an incident that reportedly saw him obstruct a ValueJet aircraft, spill liquid on a security officer, and walk onto the tarmac actions that clearly violated aviation safety regulations. The Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) initially responded with commendable firmness: a six-month no-fly ban and criminal charges. But within weeks, following public apologies and appeals from influential figures, the ban was reduced to one month and charges were dropped. Then came the appointment  as an ambassador for the very rules he had broken.

This sequence of events sends a dangerous message: that fame and influence can turn consequences into accolades. It undermines public trust, discourages security personnel from enforcing rules, and reinforces Nigeria’s long-standing “big man syndrome” where the law is rigid for ordinary citizens but flexible for the rich and powerful.

Minister Festus Keyamo defended the appointment as a form of restorative justice, comparing it to community service. But the optics are unmistakable. A celebrity violated critical safety protocols and was rewarded with a public platform. This is not justice it is privilege dressed up as reform.

If Nigeria is to build a society governed by fairness and accountability, we must stop glorifying impunity. Laws must apply equally to all, regardless of status. Until we dismantle the culture of selective enforcement, the rule of law will remain a slogan, not a standard.

About the Author:  
Steve Owaduge is a concerned citizen and commentator based in Akure, Ondo State. He writes on governance, public accountability, and social justice.